F-16 Falcon vs F-14 Tomcat Dogfight
 |
||
 |
 |
|
 |
||
Air Force F16 fighter jet (technically an F16N---denoting it was sold to the Navy---but this aircraft is mainly used by the USAF rather than Navy) vs the F14 Navy Aircraft.Instructors are piloting the F-16, students are in the F-14s. Enjoy =)
Channel: Autos & Vehicles
Uploaded: December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm
Author: cribster123
Length: 05:03
Rating: 4.58
Views: 733790
Tags: air airforce dogfight F-14 F-16 F14 F16 falcon fighter force jet navy tomcat USAF viper
Video Comments
|
sergeant137 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
pukaman, I love F-14s as much as anyone... but the F-22 is much better, and all things considered, the F-14 cost too much, and it was becoming obsolete, it had its day. The F-22 is a much better fighter, and anyone in their right mind knows that. Stop trying to argue it!
kosmo177 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
As for the IRST, it doesn't even match your initial statement in range (100+ nm), I have even founnd an article stating it is only effective up to 25nm (the F-14's AN/AAS-42 at least).
kosmo177 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
As I said, stealth also means reduced heat signature. As for Jane's, that is not an official source, but even so I couldn't find any estimate of the radar's range there. AFAIK maximum range of the AN/APG-77 has not been officially disclosed. 120nm is extremely low though, even the F-16 which is older and not so much BVR oriented has a radar with a 160nm max range.
PukaMan (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Jane's states that it's current range is 120-125 miles, with expected upgrades increasing it to 250 miles eventually. Concerning the IRST, that was only concerning my initial statement of the AP-71 eqalling the APG-77's range. And I do believe it has more to do with the heat signature given off by the plane as opposed to the size.
kosmo177 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
You should also know that stealth does not mean only reduced radar signature, it also means reduced visual and heat signatures. And you should also know that the F-22 also uses an IRST derived from the AN/AAS-42.
kosmo177 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
First of all I don't know where you got that the AN/APG-77 has a max range of around 100nm, I believe it is not published but it is reported to have a maximum detection range against a fighter sized target of over 180nm. And it's max range will be even higher. I also don't know where you got that the IRST has the same range as the AN/APG-71, it is reported to be able to ID a 747 at 100nm, for a fighter sized target it will be significantly less (maybe even half of that).
PukaMan (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
oop correction: The APG-71's range is about 220 miles, so it's almost twice that of the F-22's APG-77.
PukaMan (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Except that the F-14's APG-71 and the F-22's APG-77 have about the same range, and the Tomcat's IRST matches that.
kosmo177 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Not while being outside the F-22's radar range though. And if you're in there you're dead before you know it. So again, no.
PukaMan (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Except that F-14s are also equipped with a very powerful IRST which would pick up an F-22 easily, and passively (i.e. the Raptor wouldn't know it was being targetted) |