koford (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

Haha, u dont no for sure.

samgee2007 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

9/11 was started by jews 1 you fucking christians

skizombie (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

bleu Great question..Whatch 9/11 WTC North Tower ExplodingWhat did happen the 47 massive steel vertical core columns?Look at pics of the construction of the towers....the columns are fricken HUGE...They look like they were just pulverized.

originbleu (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

question for any meturlagists/structural engs.what is the maximum velocity the supporting columns could withstand given the planes were made of aluminium against rienforced steel?as we witnessed in Madrid fire cannot buckle let alone melt such material even a H-bomb dropped in the centre of manhattan would'nt have caused as much damage as the two jets.The problem I am struggling with is how the columns without being severed at the base could have failed on such a scale. Perhaps subsidance?

whalefish83 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

follow the money.

smegov (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

and a wick is what you nead to keep a fire burning that is fueled buy kerosene ..other than that you have to heat it up alot to get the stuff to burn,both towers had airconditioning...so they were quite cool at the time of the crash..

smegov (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

The NTSB investigation ended with the adoption of its final report on August 23, 2000. In it they concluded that the probable cause of the accident was an explosion of the center wing fuel tank, most likely as a result of faulty wiring.the wiring created the flashpiont,yes the engines on the air crafts that hit the towers,were hot,thous creating the fire ball that we saw,the building would have been cool the fuel would have cooled down and gone out,what wickeffect was in the elevator shafts?

timeforbloodywar (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

flash point is easily reached..look at TWA flight 800..it reached flashpoint and exploded in mid-air but i dont know what the wick effect is..mind explaining it to me?also how do u explain Frank Martini reporting on the 78th floor of tower 1 that the elevator shafts were at risk of collapse?

timeforbloodywar (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

watch the naudet brothers documentaryand i know flaming jet fuel creates a fire thats why i asked the conspiracy theorists how the person/people caught on fire just 2 minutes after the tower was hit

smegov (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

"the jet fuel that ran down the elevator shafts and blew up." crap crap crap jet fuel is very like kerosene it has to be heated up to over 38°C (100°F) to reach its flash point and explode it may had flowed down the shafts but it wouldn't have been on fire....its not like petrol (gasoline).and it will as you no only keep on burning if there is a wick affect..and not that hot either...so lets not be silly, if the planes ran on petrol i would agree but they don't so i cant.