Something To Chew On #2 - The Country Microsoft
![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
![]() |
||
How long do you think it will be before the Nike company assassinates the CEO of Reebok?Better yet, how long before Nike invades Reebok?Do these questions sound strange? I'm sure they sound a little odd. Let me explain.Within globalization and the "free market" principle lays a hidden, rarely ever talked about possibility. One that I personally believe has a better chance of happening than not. I believe this is where our world is headed. I have yet to hear a conversation take place about this and I hope this topic gets brought up more often. Here we go...At some point in the near future, a multi-national company is going to buy a small country. Let's say hypothetically Microsoft buys Haiti. Here are some stats on Haiti: 80% live below the World Bank's definition of poverty. Average yearly income is $240. 80% of the population's average income is $100 a year. $3 to $4 a day is the pay for manual labor. 1% of the population would be considered "Middle Class" by the Industrialized Nation's definition.What Microsoft will bring to Haitians will seem like a God send. The company will raise the average income to 10,000 a year. Manual labor will be raised to $25 a day. 15% of the population will be considered "Middle Class" by the Industrialized Nation's definition. Microsoft will be still be able to achieve greater profits.Sounds like an improvement doesn't it? And it is... and it isn't.With Microsoft owning the country and essentially the people, what is to stop Microsoft from being a dictatorial government? Microsoft would only allow Microsoft approved food and materials. The people would receive Microsoft insurance. The children would be raised to function in Microsoft jobs. Microsoft would provide the education. Microsoft would collect their taxes. The country of Microsoft will not allow competitors or foreign shoe company employees into the country. Microsoft would issue Visa's. Microsoft would control the cost of store bought goods...leading to Microsoft water, sandwich meat, condoms, cloths, etc. Microsoft will create an army. Haitians will have to pledge allegiance to Microsoft.The country of Microsoft will not have a democratically elected leader. The laws will be established to maximize production of Microsoft products. Breaking the maximizing product laws are punishable by death.You know, this reminds me of a country...China.For those that do not believe this is a possibility, let me enlighten you:In 2007, the GLOBAL GDP was estimated to be $47 trillion.The top 250 companies in the world had combined sales in excess of $14.87 trillion, equivalent to nearly a third of the global GDP and an amount exceeding the GDP of the United States and the European Union (13.2 trillion and 13.74 trillion respectively)Just the top one hundred companies had sales worth over $9.72 trillionThe combined sales of just the top five (Wal-mart, ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch Shell, BP, and General Motors) was nearly $1.5 trillion . Larger than the GDP of all but seven countries.For illustrated purposes, take all entities with sales or GDP in excess of $50 billion. All would agree that these are powerful economic units. Out of a 166 in total, only 60 are countries. 106, a substantial majority, are companies.This is not a perfect comparison sales and GDP. Corporate and national governments structures and reasons for existence are entirely different. (or are they?) GDP is also a measure of value added, where as sales are not. Also, national government budgets, the money states can spend, are only a fraction of GDP. One is linked to national interests while the other is driven by the interests of the major stock holders and chief executives and the board members who work for them.Now what should really bend your spoon is this: A 2006 study by United Nations University (UNU-WIDER) reports that the top 10 percents of adults world wide own 85 percent of global wealth, while the bottom half of the world's population owns barley 1 percent of the total.Of the elite 10 percent that own 85 percent of the wealth, the top 2 percent own half the world's wealth. The top 1 percent own 40 percent of the global wealth.So with all the information I just gave you, do you honestly believe, that the top 10 percent elites give a rat's ass what happens to you? Seriously, be honest. These people are the machine. They are the designers and the mechanics in which the system you live. In my humble opinion, globalization will lead to an even smaller concentration of power with a wider control apparatus. Corporations becoming countries is the most logical step to controlling labor cost and production. After all, if you own the labor force, what can't you produce that wouldn't be as cheap as you wanted it to be.
Channel: People & Blogs
Uploaded: July 3, 2008 at 11:02 am
Author: TheBigHo111
Length: 07:05
Rating: 4.83
Views: 289
Tags: capitalism corruption country education evolution globalization government humanity labor law money revolution
Video Comments
|
mattgeb84 (September 4, 2008 at 3:23 am)
i couldn't imagine that idiot steve balmer in charge of a country
divinejudge1 (July 5, 2008 at 12:44 am)
Colonization started with trading and shipping companies with territorial ambitions. East Indian Trading Co. is one.Colonies were created, wars were declared, and people enslaved.Currently India has Coca Cola monopolizing local sources of water. In Colombia Coca Cola hired para-military forces to kill people "who got in the way".Corporations are evil. Because money is the root of evil and this is what they strive to make.
asperin (July 4, 2008 at 5:21 pm)
Corporations have long ago controlled governments.Economic power is crucial for the NWO.Take the money out of the banks.Don't buy their products, not even one.Get gas from non-popular gas stations of Citgo stations.Donate to institutions that know about the NWO and do things(not Alex Jones, he is a fear monger Zionist ass kisser)Sabotage.Expose their poisonous corps like Monsanto.Buy some gold and silver.Stop paying the IRS money(only if you want to stop funding a world wide genocide).
wetalmorker (July 4, 2008 at 12:33 am)
I agree with Ho, to an extent. Because the U.S. is already owned, by the IMF, a bank. Microsoft is NOT who we should be worried about, it's the banks, DAMMIT!However, once all citizens are owned by one entity or another, and wages are fixed low, who are the consumers? Herein lies the fatal flaw of the NWO.It will come to life, but it won't live long. It can't. It's managed by inbred idiots, e.g.; GWB! Our time is gonna come! It is now.
real3rdlife (July 3, 2008 at 10:45 pm)
dude you can dream on ....ain't no body gonna buy haiti we fight for this country they would have to gaz us all up and secondly you people never been to haiti y'all think that haiti is only port -au-prince and cite soleil how can you people talk about haiti must of what they show you on tv is just what they want you to beleive you'll be suprise if ever u would go to haiti anyway i do understand you were trying to explain something but you choose the wrong country for ur example...
witzkeyman (July 3, 2008 at 10:22 pm)
I've been researching Haiti a lot. the citizens can't even afford mud cookies (mud, oil, and water) with this food shortage.
onlywhenprovoked (July 3, 2008 at 2:35 pm)
awesome video bro.this IS where we are headedbenito mousolini saidfascism is best described as corporatism, because it is a merger of corporate and state power
antiklaus (July 3, 2008 at 12:33 pm)
This premise was the underlying foundation of the role playing game, "ShadowRun" from the 80's, which you can still find in pen and paper and classic video game genres.People have been considering this possibility as early as the rise of corporations. Only fiction authors who were brave enough to write about it.I refer you to the visionary works of Samuel Clemens, Arthur C Clarke, or Piers Anthony.Corporo-governance is already happening, but by proxy.And look up "The L Curve" video.
DraceAmar (July 3, 2008 at 12:28 pm)
The idea reminds me a bit of the movie Idiocracy, where drnkingwater is permanetly replaced by gatorade.
givebirthathome (July 3, 2008 at 12:19 pm)
I think you are making some wrong assumptions. Even if Microsoft owned the country, why would you assume they would not have a democratically elected leader? If you had a plantation, wouldn't the most efficient way to pick the maximally effective overseer be to hold a competition to see who was most popular? Just don't let your overseer change any of the rules.... |

