dinojin (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Where did we come from ? Where are we going ? what can or , are you going to do about any thing.. we are only dust in the wind.. Do what u can as you can.. This time spent, is limited. Embrace family & friends that are embraceable. Live a good life.. If you are gifted will something, anything , that can be shared with the world, let it be seen, shine, shine your little shine be you burn out like a distant star! .Forsaken k9.

dasheriff001 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

you quote mining mother fucker, to answer your second question, he went on to explain why we don't find innumerable transitional forms. becuase for something to become a fossils certain conditions must be met, which conincidentaly very rarely occur. and the piltdown man was not accepted as a pice of evidence by many scientists at the time, they wanted thorough investigation into the matter. how pathetic.

spectaboi (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Why is there NO PROOF for evolution? Why do evolutionists have to forge fossils (eg the pilt down man which had an orangutan jaw fixed onto a human skull)? Darwin himself was confused and wrote a chapter in his book - "The origin of species" called "Difficulties Of The Theory". He wrote, "Why if species have descended from other species by fine graduations, DO WE NOT EVERYWHERE SEE INNUMERABLE TRANSITIONAL FORMS? so if you understand more about evolution than darwin answer that?

procommenter (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

An incomprehensible comprehensive change of fortune it would take, amongst all flora & fauna, to realize Darwin's jigsaw puzzle. From hereon in, & from now on: it's unsalted cashews for me! Concern yourself not with my inconsequential injuries. My mind, body & soul remain unified. Do my enlighten'd steps mystify you? Does my pick-up-&-go-attitude befuddle you? Am I unrecognizable to all who would belittle Hermann Goering? Should we goose-step in lock-step to please our modern socialists?

Animas3D (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I don't get the idea of this video. Is it calling into question the legacy of Darwin or celebrating it?

jogsingumboots (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Eugenics under this definition would have killed my intellectually disabled mum, so I would not have been born - I'm halfway through a university doctorate. Plus as someone below rightly pointed out, eugenics would have decreased diversity so if taken to its logical conclusion there would have to be inbreding, and we all know how that works out.

ogirv101 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Charles darwin was agnostic,"He was always insistent that he was agnostic and had "never been an atheist"., its funny how you made non believers of yourselves from the work of a person who doesn't know if God exists or not?

dasheriff001 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

i think eugenics has a major flaw. it is decided by humans (who have a reputation for being imperfect), i think it would lead to the varity being reduced therefore our chances of suvival reduced if conditions change.

procommenter (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

People resent Darwin, his mockery & monkeyshines.

robertorgan (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

They perish because they refused to love the truth and be saved. For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie.(2 Thess 2:10-11)