TechVidSite.com
Have some videos!

Ruger Mini-14: Homestead Defender Pt 2

My New Video Site
My New Video Site My New Video Site
My New Video Site

PART 2 OF 3: The Ruger Mini-14 is everything that Ruger says it is: light, fast handling, and durable. Right or wrong, Ruger has always marketed the Mini-14 as ranch and varmint rifle. However it also is a viable, high-value defensive rifle choice that makes a lot of sense and thousands of good people have purchased a Mini-14 with that exact use in mind. Nutnfancy has had a lot of trigger time behind Minis and can attest to their durability, reliability, and indeed impressive handling characteristics. For those users wanting customization, the Mini-14 can be outfitted with folding stocks (Butler Creek folder being the best) barrel shrouds, flash suppressors (older Minis), normal capacity magazines, and optics. In recent years the Mini-14 was finally improved by Ruger: thicker, more accurate barrel, an improved synthetic stock, and improved iron peep sights. Nicely done. The Mini-14 represents a good value in tactical carbines that can serve well in the defensive/offensive role as needed by law enforcement, select military users, and good ole civilian sheepdogs. But it has some definite downsides that a potential buyer should consider. First, its touted lightweight will be worsened by the fitment of optics using the heavy steel Ruger rings (included). And the normal capacity. quality magazines for the Mini-14 (like ProMag brand and Ruger factory mags) are usually made of steel and will add even more weight to your loadout (compared to AR-15 alternatives). Other downsides include: still unimpressive accuracy of only about 3 MOA with standard ammo, lack of an integral Picatinny rail system for optics mounting, inability to mount flash suppressors to new Mini-14, lack of accessory railing for light mounts, and a higher cost for magazines. The Target versions of the Mini-14 with their adjustable harmonic barrel dampeners totally correct the accuracy problems inherent in the design and they shoot tight groups. However they are much heavier (add 2 lbs) and more expensive, negating the high value advantage of the Mini-14. The design also comes in 6.8 SPC and 7.62x39mm loadings but their mags are harder still to find and Nutnfancy recommends the standard .223 version unless you want a deer rifle as well (get the 6.8 SPC in that case). Also be advised the 7.62x39mm Mini has a looser chamber to accommodate surplus ammo and it is even more inaccurate. But despite a few drawbacks, the Mini-14 remains a high-selling favorite among American shooters. For defensive use out to 100 yrds, the Mini would serve admirably despite its lack of ultimate accuracy. Couple that will diehard reliability and reasonable cost, the Ruger Mini-14 still remains a smart choice for the tactical carbine buyer.////////////////Nutnfancy Likeability Scale: 7 out of 10/////////////// If you own a gun of ANY kind and are not a member of the NRA you need to change your ways. Political battles rage that serve to disarm you, leaving you the potential victim of criminals who have NEVER obeyed gun laws. Join the NRA today and donate generously to the NRA/ILA. This is a patriotic, freedom organization that fights tirelessly to maintain our freedoms and it advocates no political party.

Channel: Science & Technology
Uploaded: November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
Author: nutnfancy

Length: 17:13
Rating: 4.92
Views: 10404

Tags: .223  6.8  7.62x39mm  accuracy  ak-47  and  ar-15  ar15  armalite  best  bushmaster  butler  capacity  carbine  cdnn  choate  colt  combat  creek  defensive  dpms  gun  kel-tec  m4  machine  mag  magazines  mini14  normal  nra  nra/ila  nutnfancy  pmi  pro  project  ranch  review  rifle  river  rock  shtf  sks  SPC  su-16  survival  systems  tactical  thermold  tool  weapon  Wilson  wrol  

Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

HighRever911 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Read a book? You should learn to type a message, your spelling sucks
HighRever911 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Read a Book? You should learn how to type a message your spelling sucks!
bighitter42 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I understand what you're saying about nearly identical people running, and unfortunately I think it's the way power works in modern society. I'm not defending it, and I'm certainly not defending either of the douchebags you were referring to. There's absolutely a monopoly of power in government today, but it's nothing new. The best way to fight it is by upholding a constitutional republic, something we haven't done.
Realizalize (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
what is the chance of you running against a dude from your indoor-halma team, for a position in government? that is what happened. so gunners tell the public this stuff, just to alienate someone they ought to dislike for financial benefit of their interest group? thats not new, unlike the other story.)
bighitter42 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I didn't say that it prevented rights from being trampled, only an educated populace can achieve that. I said it's the only legitimate last resort...and present in a free society. The rest of your statement doesn't make any sense. George W. Bush hasn't done anything that's out of line with anything resembling American foreign policy for the past 100 years. It's not a good thing, but this conspiracy shit is getting old dude. It reduces the legitimate arguments against these policies to jokes
Realizalize (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
contradiction is; protecting rights by being armed! so the son of a cia/boss who was president is president too and in a secret society; his opponent in election was too/got to get hit by biggest terror operation in history, after putting in cahrge several laws, by braking others, to ripp usayans of some kinds of freedom. all the time 2. Ammandement was in place, and gunners braging how they are the living force against tyrrany. well done gunners! tahnk you. read f...ing book!
bighitter42 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
cont... So who the hell are those of you who hate freedom protecting? Absolutely nobody except for those who want a monopoly on force...generally the government and criminals. Even Gandhi said that of all the crimes the British committed against the Indians, barring them the use of arms was the worst(the exact quote differs only slightly). So take your time and tell me, where the hell did I contradict myself, because as far as I can tell, I've been incredibly consistent defending liberty.
bighitter42 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You said there were contradictions here(presumably in my argument.) Where did I contradict myself? I complain about the loss of ALL rights, not just gun rights. The second amendment was clearly instituted to act as a last resort against a tyrannical government. Not for hunting, and not for self defense in the limited sense that it's used today. There is only ONE credible report in the world that doesn't show a decrease in crime with more guns...it didn't show an increase either though.cont.
toledopilot (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
BTW.. Great vid.
Realizalize (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
no you aren`t, see, and that is the problem. is it the frequency? complainig about rights being taken away, which kind of has been done. so what is the prupose, what and whom you gunners are protecting from what?


 
if((location.href.substr(0,6)=="https:") || (location.href.substr(0,6)=="HTTPS:")) { L10pc="https"; } else { L10pc="http"; } document.write(''); -->