Dodge Challenger SRT8 @ the Track
 |
||
 |
 |
|
 |
||
LEARN MORE ABOUT THE DODGE CHALLENGER SRT8: http://www.edmunds.com/insidel... 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT8 is a muscle car, right? An American muscle car. So naturally, the first thing I want to do when I jump behind the wheel is a big American smoky burnout."Not here," says Pete Gladysz, the Dodge guy babysitting our test car and riding shotgun, as he looks around the leafy, tranquil residential street we're on in the middle of Pasadena. "Wait 'till we get to the track."Gladysz, powertrain senior manager for Chrysler LLC's SRT Group, sounds serious. So I wait.
Channel: Autos & Vehicles
Uploaded: December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm
Author: InsideLineVideo
Length: 01:15
Rating: 4.39
Views: 103186
Tags: American auto car Challenger Dodge Edmunds Inside Line motor muscle race racing SRT-8
Video Comments
|
Norse1974 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Your only talking 3 tenths of a second differance Bro.Mustang GT 13.40's Challenger SRT8 13.10's.Very close between the two.I do like both cars.I am seriously looking at buying a Challenger SRT8 to park next to my 2006GT!IMO these are the two best looking retro rides out there!
notfromohio (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
totally right. i knew the numbers seemed slower. guess it depends on the driver..
305pride (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
lol rape. im getting the rape machine.
blown06tc (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
meant stupid.
blown06tc (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
no, only immature kids call people stupic on the internet, THAT includes YOU.
directorjustin (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
everyone calls people stupid over the internet including YOU.
sugarprobe (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
I own a 2007 Mustang GT with tune and CAI. I have not lost to a challenger RT or SRT8 yet. That being said I want a 6 spd challenger RT so bad I can't see straight. I don't care that mustang is a quicker car and don't care that the new camaro will rape this thing. I just love the car and can't wait to get it. Cheers all.
blown06tc (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
directorjustin- WOW! You're so mature calling someone stupid over the internet, you definitely one of those that slipped past the condom.th3ha1og0d-- Sorry I did not know that since I haven't read up on the car. Those guys at inside line need new drivers, lol. I love the styling of the car, I would've bought one if the car did better on the MPG department.
th3ha1og0d (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
I've got motortrend right here.Times for the challenger are 4.6 0-60 and 13.1 quarter mile on the MT, and 4.7 0-60 for the auto with the same quarter mile. A stock 300hp mustang will NOT be able to take a challenger.
directorjustin (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
i honestly dont care about porformance between the challenger and mustang, the challenger is just cooler and meaner looking. |