ipodguru22 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

that would be so fun to be in. kind of. lol

Watcheruvdatube (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

Hi. i am comparing 911 collapse to others gone wrong and successful. Why? because your gov. lies way to much...In this collapse as others that have failed the biggest thing i see is that the structure remains intact unlike 911 where "without explosives", just jet fuel(a very light fuel) and heat melting top grade steel the building falls in on itself....huh??? Well as you see here with weight on top the building remains because secondary and higher core explosives failed..Seek TRUTH !!!

unimoggie (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

"It was always envisaged there would be a permanent structure following demolition" ... Lol was that a politician covering up after a building collapse? Its a like a nervous tic for them isn't it ;)

freezazoid (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

steel buildings are far superior to stone buildings. That's why you could never have a stone building the size of the sears tower or wtc's.

youngtrigga17 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

the wtc was poorly built campare the twin towers structure to the empire state buildings structure the empire state building is made of steal lime stone and many other hard compounds that can withstand blast like dat the wtc was made of only steel beams and concret foam im not making this up google the structurul plans for the buildings

George21T (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

LOL NOW THE Hotel owner can save money haha. yaaaaa

collinsy12 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

god must love tht building as he didnt want it to go

jirosinlove (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

it was a 20 story building to a 10 story building... lol

vramage (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

plecter you dont even know what i was replying to so but out you live in norway what the fuck would you know i do i was there

chebrkna (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)

I live in that building