omenow (September 2, 2008 at 3:23 pm)

Hahahahaha, jaysonordan, Roger is a great champion, but Rafa is proving to be slightly better. Anyway, I'm sure that it's going to be tight between both (and we sall not forget about Novak). We will see what future holds. They have a great rivalry and both, apart from being top class, are gentlemen.

jaysonordan (September 2, 2008 at 2:58 pm)

my bad! I'll still find an excuse for my hero :P

omenow (September 2, 2008 at 12:55 pm)

jaysonordan, maybe you have to research a little more (or better). In most cases the weakness from mononucleosis lasts no more than 2 months. Was Roger an exception? hahahaaa. He would not have played if he was ill; it's obvious. He has recovered months ago. He was perfectly right in Wimbledon and lost because Nadal was better. Period. That is all. Don't make up excuses.

hollisterrbabex3 (August 31, 2008 at 4:55 pm)

rafa won wimbledonthe olmpicysand no US OPENI LOVE U RAFA

jaysonordan (August 30, 2008 at 3:03 pm)

Do you really want to discuss this in a serious way or are you just trying to talk trash?Federer had mono in the beginning of the year. You might wanna research how incredibly bad of a disease for an athlete that is. Furthermore, you should also take into account the surfaces that Federer and Nadal have played on against each other. Mainly clay! Nadal isn't known as "King of Clay" without a reason. But you got one thing right: Nadal is the current No.1 in the world.

jaysonordan (August 30, 2008 at 2:58 pm)

Federer hat mono in the beginning of this year. Mono can stay in your system for a year and longer!!! I agree that Nadal is incredible but I wouldn't write off FedEx yet. Next year will show if he can be on top of the game again. I think he can.

marvinsmit1 (August 28, 2008 at 9:07 pm)

rafa might win the us open and australian. but i think roland garros and wimbledon probably for sure. and federer won't even come to finals i think.. he had his best time.

kognajd (August 23, 2008 at 2:47 pm)

i think rafa was the no. 1 today but i am sure that he will not stay longer as no.1

omenow (August 21, 2008 at 10:25 pm)

01914787, I expressed a true fact: Nadal with 22 is better than Federer with 22. It is not fair to compare Roger at 27 with Rafa being 5 years younger. I did not express a dream, I just said that IF Nadal maintains his progression he will be the best in History; no one has won more than him at his age. Now Nadal is number 1 and Olympic champion. He probably won't be number 1 for 5 years, but I think that he will win more tittles than any other tennis player. But we will have to wait and see.

maddes111 (August 21, 2008 at 9:20 pm)

thats right but i think he has to win all this tournemants now. his tennis is so grueling that he can't play it when he will be as old as roger now or older.