gulguim (October 13, 2008 at 6:44 pm)

TA GIRANDO!

shockolanu (October 12, 2008 at 2:06 pm)

Great comment, man! People just can't believe it. All they think about is burning fuel instead of finding smarter ways to get energy. P.S. Are you good at physics? I have a project on my own, I just need to know if it's possible to work and I need someone to help me out with the calculus. Cheers!

Guessagainkk (October 12, 2008 at 2:00 pm)

Secondly, notice the axel on the right side are much shorter than the one on the left (just like an electric motor where one end are design to attach something else) and there is absolutely no technical reason to have it that long.In fact solid metal (probably common stainless steel as it is non magnetic) are very heavy judging by it size & if I where them I would definately shorten it to give maximum output.

shockolanu (October 12, 2008 at 1:58 pm)

Here is the catch, you need a hollow space in the magnet alignment circle. So, you can either use one electromagnet that can go on and off or you just don't put one there. Please search "George Green magnetic motor" on youtube. It's not complicated to design the motor, it's hard to obtain great power out of it. You need big magnets to provide big output that is all. Please spread the word, it's simple. People need to use alternate energy. Oil is just rotten carcasses of animals and plants...

Guessagainkk (October 12, 2008 at 1:47 pm)

Dude, your teacher was right in saying that magnets placed in a specific location can then generate circular motion, it nothing new, but require the use of electro-magnetism to switch magnetic field (e.g. maglev train). Many have tried using 100% permanet magnet for "free energy" & realized there is a dead point in which the disc cannot go beyond 1 revolution (search: "Magnetic Wankel Motor 3a") UNLESS using a mechnical timing lever OR electro-magnet, but this design doesn't show how it done.

iamthenix (October 12, 2008 at 9:32 am)

Actually, the problem isn't writing new laws of physics or thermodynamics.. This is already accepted. It's writing new laws of electricity! (which are about 100 years old as far as I know)

johnnyboypdq (October 12, 2008 at 9:12 am)

OK, to all the guys/girls out there denying this actually does not work. Where is your prototype of the same design to prove that it doesn't work. Words are cheap and action speaks louder than cheap words. SO your saying that magnets do not repell or attract? If placed in a particular sequence to repell and attract and causes a circular motion that it doesn't work? What am I missing here. You don't have to have a PHD in Physic to know magnets attract and repell, do the math before you deny.

vietarc (October 11, 2008 at 3:12 pm)

You must understand that you're asking for the actual numeric magnitude. If this prove possible, engineering can amplify the magnitude with no problem.

shockolanu (October 11, 2008 at 1:17 pm)

dude, you're lame. use your brain and not try to make this look like a fake. :D When I was a kid, like in 3-4 grade, I was playing with magnets and thought that it's possible. I talked to my physics teach when I was in 6th grade and told me that it's possible as long as you have a circular device that generates fields with different poles. It's possible and I believe it!

Guessagainkk (October 11, 2008 at 2:34 am)

If this isn't fake then this is the 2nd time in which the law of physics "dont" apply, where the 1st is before the big bang & parallel universe.It really annoying that most ppl gone through all the trouble to make things spin out of thin air, but decided later not to add a dynamo to see how much KWH it generating.It does beg the question whether or not it has enough torque energy produced in order to overcome the resistibility of the dynamo or the energy required to make these magnets.