TechVidSite.com
Have some videos!

BBC REPORTED WTC - 7 COLLAPSED 20 MINUTES BEFORE IT FELL!

My New Video Site
My New Video Site My New Video Site
My New Video Site

On September 11th 2001, BBC World reported at 4:57pm Eastern Time that the Salomon Brothers Building (more commonly known as WTC7 or World Trade Building 7) had collapsed.This even made the 5pm EST headlines, what is bizarre is that the building did not actually collapse until 5:20pm EST.9/11 was unusual enough, without BBC World being able to foretell the destiny of WTC 7.What is even stranger, is that the women reporter is telling the world that the building had collapsed when you can see it in the background over her left shoulder.Then at 5:15pm EST, just five minutes before the building did actually collapse, her live connection from New York to London mysteriously fails.So the question is, on 9/11 how did the BBC learn that WTC7 collapsed 23 minutes before it actually did.

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm
Author: Question1981

Length: 25:43
Rating: 4.54
Views: 129682

Tags: 9/11  BBC  COLLAPSE  LIE  MI6  WTC  WTC7  

Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

707umair (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
umm just look at the fucking facts its obvious
707umair (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
obviously not half the damn country knows the truth. they didn't do a good job covering up anything
jolonui (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
Stonegroove90 is correct. I too was watching this live on BBC. It is not faked or edited. The original recorded tapes went missing after this broadcast on the day and were only found last year apparantly misfiled in the 2007 section??? how???
jdavis8 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
IT'S DE-BRIS NOT DEB-RIS!british...
getgrowingnow (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
why does everyone just accept the fact that nothing is being accomplished?
getgrowingnow (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
There is too much energy and discussion still being put into this and other related events. Its evident that there is an absurd amount of unanswered questions yet we still talk. & years.
hrgiger (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
You have a valid question, but sadly anything negating conspiracy or anti-Bush sentiment is greeted with cries of 'What a dumbass!' or 'You are brainwashed!'. See also - 'You are part of the Conspiracy!'. This is according those who know the 'truth' (ergo everything is a conspiracy). Logic dictates that not every single tiny detail of 911 can be a conspiracy, but nothing will sway these folks, which it is arguably disturbing in some cases. I try to be objective about it but I'm not popular.
eyepatchinc (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
i wasnt questioning weather or not SHE was broadcasting live, i was questioning weather or not the footage in the background was live & if she was even IN new york. my point is: this just seems like TOO big of a misstep by the people who carried out the 9/11 coverup. i would think they'd be smarter than this - to announce something before it happens
stonegroove90 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
make that white letters ;)red backround
stonegroove90 (December 31, 1969 at 5:59 pm)
I was watching it live at the time,see the big LIVE in red letters?


 
if((location.href.substr(0,6)=="https:") || (location.href.substr(0,6)=="HTTPS:")) { L10pc="https"; } else { L10pc="http"; } document.write(''); -->