Ron Paul on Old Newsletter Controversy (Part 1)
![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
![]() |
||
Ron Paul responds to charges of racism regarding some of his old newsletters on Wolf Blitzer, CNN, Jan. 10, 2008 -- See part 2 here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...
Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
Author: egarris99
Length: 06:18
Rating: 4.85
Views: 12889
Tags: Paul Ron
Video Comments
|
MythofDemocracy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The real question is what has this confused old man done with those tens of millions of dollars that he raised before he bottled out.
animeintrostyles (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
First quotes racist, but the second ain't.
sniper6081 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Yeah. What he said.
enomarekim (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Ron Paul would be against the civil rights act because it totally disregards personal property rights. If an individual does not want members of another race to be employed in his business, then under the constitution he does not have to. All the government has to do is to inform the public, and the buying power of the people will shun that business. This is how a free market economy works, but idiots like you assume that being against the CR act is racist
OptimumTaurus (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Right, Tesselator, the "opposite of a racist" votes against Voting Rights Acts and Civil Rights Acts. You have obviously done no homework.
zalkyre (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
and i geuss they say this is racism, silly media, taking things way out of context, people just cant accept when someone say something that makes sense not because of opinion but because of evidence..
MustacheVerra (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Like we're going to believe David Gergen! lol...
c0mp73r (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
he ask if he took responsibility , I said yes...
so what is your question? or were you just excited for a minute?...
easy now... don't hurt yourself... lol
MoralityRules (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
So he didn't know what was in his own newsletters then or even over a decade later? This makes as much sense as Roger Clemens' statement on his alleged steroid abuse. It's impossible that he could be so detached from his own staff and letters for such a period of time as to never know what was representing him, and his response to these allegations lacks transparency and leaves much to be answered.
LostFan1128 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
They are purposely trying to make paul lose votes, cheaters |

