7anadi (August 11, 2008 at 12:53 am)

¨ღ¨ OH my GOD ¨ღ¨¨ღ¨ butiful , favor movie ¨ღ¨¨ღ¨how many enzym ?how many nuclutid?? how many pond ?? and how time that need ??¨ღ¨¨ღ¨ all that endicator for GOD ¨ღ¨¨ღ¨ i wish u read about God and God creative ¨ღ¨¨ღ¨ thank u very much for this perfect animation ¨ღ¨

midian11 (July 15, 2008 at 3:18 pm)

if Douglas Adams were live I'm sure he would have something to say :Dall stuff around us should be considered as chance. Sure there are laws but chances made em. Somewhere something happened or nothing happened so much that something came to be providing us with existence. This is a beutiful structure I just love it. Oh and those of you who worry about the origin of things is it god or not. read hitchikkers guide to the galaxy and laugh with the creation and end of everything.made me happy :D

6i3094534053984 (June 22, 2008 at 10:45 pm)

I see a ...a miracle...i see God in this wonderful events! [345]

Balaskh (June 19, 2008 at 6:55 pm)

whoa i just realized that weird thing the upper side does is nothing but the binding of okazaki fragmentsawesome representation

Elliotman07 (June 18, 2008 at 2:45 am)

NEW TOPIC: Elliotman07's movie idea-...

rowanofrin1 (June 17, 2008 at 3:02 pm)

Bloody hell, I hate it when creationists say 'they don't believe in an outdated old theory'. Yes, it was made in the 19th century, but time does not invalidate something. Newton's laws are still as potent as they were back in the day,shit moves.However, Darwin was definitely wrong about some things. But this is SCIENCE, we don't just blindly put our faith in something, we observe, and progress and learn, and so we have seen the theory of evolution 'evolve' since its conception,into its from now

MitchoK1989 (June 17, 2008 at 2:42 pm)

I hear that, with reference to the Gospel of Family Guy ..."how Christian of you - believe what I say or i'll hit you"

MitchoK1989 (June 17, 2008 at 2:39 pm)

You should review the McCarty,Mcleod and Avery experiment before saying that the mechanism, moreover it was a theory in the early 20thC, confirmed in the mid 20thC and is being elaborated now in the 21stC. Consider Harvey's postulates of science, it's about educated theories which can be confirmed and re-affirmed. DNA is not exactly a mistery anymore, whilst mechanisms of it's packing are vague to some extent much is known. I mean proteins can be synthesized in vitro - 'nuff said'

valepu86 (June 2, 2008 at 12:22 pm)

i see Enzyms in theese wonderful events!

thnguyen24 (June 1, 2008 at 6:17 am)

Science is more than just natualism and materialism. Science is about searching for the truth. Just as you don't believe in God, I don't believe that a nineteenth century theory can explain what has just been widely sort-of fully known in the twentieth century, aka DNA.Keep your bias as you please, but my advice is that you should open your mind for newly discovered evidence although it might be painful because it opposes what you have put your whole trust on.