punisher17011990 (August 26, 2008 at 2:12 pm)

are u joking? the modern abrams use the same gun as the leo2 and its the best in the world.

xChevyx350x (August 25, 2008 at 2:05 am)

the Leopard has never been proven in combat beyond little insurgent AK47 skirmishes,and the Abrams has braved hoards of RPG wielding shitheads and proven resilient against MASSIVE roadside bombs. and the Abrams uses the L44 soits sabot rounds get a better gas seal than L55

BugattiVeyron123 (August 24, 2008 at 9:17 am)

I think that the German Leopard 2A6 is better than the Abrams. This is because of the engine and because the Leo has the newer, better L55 gun...compared to the L44 installed in the Abrams tanks...

hamisharn (August 24, 2008 at 4:13 am)

auto-loader? americans dont use that because you can reload faster with a human reoader.

Pewpewlas3rgun (August 23, 2008 at 12:55 am)

"even T-34 is better."And that's why the T-72, which is a vastly improved version of the T-34, got massacred in the Gulf War?

monimstarfox (August 22, 2008 at 11:01 pm)

yeah lol why do they i mean we earned the power

Tormentor (August 22, 2008 at 8:44 am)

Like in Afghanistan, where a bunch of Taliban fought you and your proud and massive (and glorous) army out of the country. In a head to head battle I am pretty confident that the Leo would rape everything else most likely. Heck listen to the video, all thjey do is compare this tank to the Leo and besides we're walking about German engineering here my friend ;).

S3CT10NE1GHT (August 19, 2008 at 8:04 pm)

why bicker over which is best out of the chally 2 and the abrams when we're on the same side?

ub3rn00b6 (August 10, 2008 at 6:47 pm)

looks like a rhino of san andreas

tatersalad29 (August 6, 2008 at 2:39 am)

proved by being destroyed by far less numerous western equipment?